On Monday, the Supreme Court acknowledged how revealing those location records can be. In Chatrie v. United States, a 6-3 ...
A new Supreme Court ruling says a person does not lose constitutional protection just because their phone constantly sends ...
Can Your Location Data Get You Arrested? As an adult living in 2026, you’ve almost certainly been complicit in the modern ...
While they might not be used for it as much as in days past, the main function of a mobile phone, even for Pixel phones, is ...
In its first digital-privacy case since 2018, the court builds on a privacy precedent it set then.
Geofence warrants work differently from traditional investigations. Instead of starting with a suspect, police define a ...
Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the 6-3 court that people don’t forfeit expectations of privacy even when they opt into ...
The 6-3 ruling in Chatrie v. United States held that a so-called geofence warrant — which compels companies such as Google to ...
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement officers invade a cell phone user’s reasonable expectation of privacy ...
Your cellphone continuously creates a durable and revealing digital trail that law enforcement can obtain with a warrant.
A new ruling rules that geofence warrants are Fourth Amendment searches, but it stops short of banning police access to revealing location histories ...
Bay Area-based and national privacy advocates welcomed the decision, which places limits on how cellphone location data is ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results