The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear the Sulyma v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee case, in which plan participants claimed they were not made fully aware of the risks and expenses ...
In its February 26, 2020, unanimous decision in Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, the United States Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding what constitutes “actual ...
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) fiduciaries often assert statute of limitations as an affirmative defense to breach of fiduciary duty claims. Under ERISA, a plaintiff must ...
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) does not actually define "actual knowledge" required by participants who file fiduciary breach cases, and U.S. Circuit Courts are split on the issue ...
The question of what facts or actions create “actual knowledge” of alleged wrongdoing, recently tested in the 9th Circuit, are critical in ERISA litigation and play a key role when judges are asked to ...
Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans – ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results